<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Doug Hamlin&#039;s Brain &#187; news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doughamlin.com/blog/tag/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doughamlin.com/blog</link>
	<description>The worst &#34;blog&#34; on the Internet. Now with more &#34;log.&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 02:06:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>For-profit GlobalPost aims for world coverage</title>
		<link>http://doughamlin.com/blog/for-profit-globalpost-aims-for-world-coverage/</link>
		<comments>http://doughamlin.com/blog/for-profit-globalpost-aims-for-world-coverage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Quick Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MinnPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duder.org/?p=40</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Serendipity led me to the GlobalPost this afternoon as I tried to clear out the tons of unread items in my Google Reader (after two hours, I still have 1000+ unread items). First I read an article linked from McClatchy&#8217;s &#8230; <a href="http://doughamlin.com/blog/for-profit-globalpost-aims-for-world-coverage/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><p><br/><br/><a href="http://doughamlin.com/blog/for-profit-globalpost-aims-for-world-coverage/">For-profit GlobalPost aims for world coverage</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serendipity led me to the GlobalPost this afternoon as I tried to clear out the tons of unread items in my Google Reader (after two hours, I still have 1000+ unread items). First I read an article linked from McClatchy&#8217;s <a href="http://washingtonbureau.typepad.com/southamerica/2009/04/quick-whats-the-capital-of-brazil.html">Inside South America</a> blog about <a href="http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/brazil/090422/how-much-do-you-know-about-brazil" target="_blank">Brazilians&#8217; perception of Americans as ignorant</a>. A few minutes later, I saw that <a href="http://www.minnpost.com/stories/2009/04/21/8221/minnpost_introduces_world_coverage_from_globalpost" target="_blank">MinnPost has partnered with GlobalPost</a>. I&#8217;m glad to see there are people out there trying different approaches to funding good news coverage. I missed last month&#8217;s <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/23/business/media/23global.html" target="_blank">article in the New York Times about GlobalPost</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>That ad-supported reporting is only one part of the GlobalPost business plan. If it is to succeed, it will depend in part on how many people sign up for a separate paid section of the site, which was to have been available in test mode beginning last week but is now expected to go online in the coming days.</p></blockquote>
<p><br/><br/><a href="http://doughamlin.com/blog/for-profit-globalpost-aims-for-world-coverage/">For-profit GlobalPost aims for world coverage</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doughamlin.com/blog/for-profit-globalpost-aims-for-world-coverage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News comments suck</title>
		<link>http://doughamlin.com/blog/news-comments-suck/</link>
		<comments>http://doughamlin.com/blog/news-comments-suck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 17:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Quick Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duder.org/?p=36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heffernan muses on online news comments, which she calls a &#8220;bête noire for journalists and readers alike.&#8221; Turns out most comments on news stories aren&#8217;t intelligent. Who knew? Commenters, in short, rarely really sock it to a columnist. They also &#8230; <a href="http://doughamlin.com/blog/news-comments-suck/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><p><br/><br/><a href="http://doughamlin.com/blog/news-comments-suck/">News comments suck</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heffernan <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/26/magazine/26wwln-medium-t.html?pagewanted=all" target="_blank">muses on online news comments</a>, which she calls a &#8220;bête noire for journalists and readers alike.&#8221; Turns out most comments on news stories aren&#8217;t intelligent. Who knew?</p>
<blockquote><p>Commenters, in short, rarely really sock it to a columnist. They also too often go automatic, churning out 100-word synopses of one stock ideological position after another. But most disappointing of all, for readers, is that commenters don’t, as literary critics say, read an article <span class="italic">against</span> itself to show how, for example, an argument framed as incendiary is in fact banal, or one that’s meant to be feminist is retrogressive, or one that touts its originality is a knockoff.</p></blockquote>
<p><br/><br/><a href="http://doughamlin.com/blog/news-comments-suck/">News comments suck</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doughamlin.com/blog/news-comments-suck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
